Legal Opinion

Schadt v. Brill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1913No. Docket No. 123PublishedCited by 56 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer, J. Bill by Mary Sehadfc against Daniel Brill and another for an injunction against the violation of building restrictions. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

In this case defendants have appealed from a decree of the circuit court of the county of Wayne, in chancery, enjoining them from erecting any double house, flat, or dwelling house building, intended, or suitable, for the separate occupancy of more than one family, upon lot 5, of the Whitney subdivision of part of private claim 678, fronting on the west side of Grand Boulevard East, in the city of Detroit. Said subdivision consists of 77 lots, 32 of which front on the west side of Grand Boulevard East, and 45 on the east side of Helen avenue, the next parallel street to the west. All deeds…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Landell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Lattimer v. . LivermoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Harris v. RorabackMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Wallace v. St. ClairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. Paulist Fathers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. McQuade v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API