Legal Opinion

O’connor v. Resort Custom Builders, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1999No. Docket 109832PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

A developer sought to sell interval ownership interests in a home located in a subdivision restricted to private residences. The circuit court enjoined the sales, but the Court of Appeals reversed. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the judgment of the circuit court.

i

The Shanty Creek resort is a large development in Antrim County. Spread across many of its acres are golf courses, downhill and cross-country skiing areas, tennis courts, swimming pools, homes, condominiums, a hotel and convention center, and other recreational facilities. The residential portions of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. GoodloveMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Wood v. BlanckeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Swan v. MitshkunMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Carey v. LauhoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Beulah Hoagland Appleton Qualified Personal Residence Trust v. Emmet County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. City of Huntington Woods v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Pinehaven Planning Board v. BrooksIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Scott v. WalkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API