Conley v. Lindsay Acura
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Tyack, Presiding Judge.
The facts of this case are both straightforward and undisputed. In 1996, defendant, Lindsay Acura (“Acura”), a car dealership, ran a print advertisement in a local newspaper that contained language offering $200 off the purchase price of any vehicle. The relevant language of the coupon reads as follows: “Bring This Ad In And SAVE $200.00 OFF Selling Price!”
The plaintiff, Robert Conley, Jr., went to Acura armed with seventy-four copies of the ad, which he offered, unsuccessfully, as full payment for a vehicle. According to Conley, since the advertisement contained no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Noroski v. FalletOhio Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shumaker v. Hamilton Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Struna v. Convenient Food MartOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Frank v. WNB Group, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- McPhillips v. United States Tennis Assn. Midwest, 2006-L-187 (7-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Barlow v. Gap, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.