Legal Opinion

Conley v. Lindsay Acura

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1997No. 97APE04-557PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tyack, Presiding Judge.

The facts of this case are both straightforward and undisputed. In 1996, defendant, Lindsay Acura (“Acura”), a car dealership, ran a print advertisement in a local newspaper that contained language offering $200 off the purchase price of any vehicle. The relevant language of the coupon reads as follows: “Bring This Ad In And SAVE $200.00 OFF Selling Price!”

The plaintiff, Robert Conley, Jr., went to Acura armed with seventy-four copies of the ad, which he offered, unsuccessfully, as full payment for a vehicle. According to Conley, since the advertisement contained no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Noroski v. FalletOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shumaker v. Hamilton Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Struna v. Convenient Food MartOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Frank v. WNB Group, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. McPhillips v. United States Tennis Assn. Midwest, 2006-L-187 (7-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Barlow v. Gap, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API