Legal Opinion

Shumaker v. Hamilton Chevrolet, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2009No. 08CA28PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

{¶ 1} Charles Shumaker filed suit against Hamilton Chevrolet, Inc. (“Hamilton”) after he learned that the used 2002 Chevrolet Blazer that Hamilton sold him had sustained significant damage in a prior accident. Following a bench trial, the trial court found that Hamilton violated the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (“CSPA”), ordered a rescission of the sales contract, and awarded Shumaker attorney fees. Shumaker appeals the trial court’s decision to award him attorney fees in the amount of $14,250. Hamilton cross-appeals, challenging the trial court’s findings that Hamilton…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Blodgett v. BlodgettOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Einhorn v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Williams v. Spitzer Autoworld Canton, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  3. O'Donnell v. N.E. Ohio Neighborhood Health Servs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Davis v. Byers VolvoOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Ferron v. METAREWARD, INC.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API