Shumaker v. Hamilton Chevrolet, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
{¶ 1} Charles Shumaker filed suit against Hamilton Chevrolet, Inc. (“Hamilton”) after he learned that the used 2002 Chevrolet Blazer that Hamilton sold him had sustained significant damage in a prior accident. Following a bench trial, the trial court found that Hamilton violated the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (“CSPA”), ordered a rescission of the sales contract, and awarded Shumaker attorney fees. Shumaker appeals the trial court’s decision to award him attorney fees in the amount of $14,250. Hamilton cross-appeals, challenging the trial court’s findings that Hamilton…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Blodgett v. BlodgettOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Einhorn v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Williams v. Spitzer Autoworld Canton, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- O'Donnell v. N.E. Ohio Neighborhood Health Servs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Davis v. Byers VolvoOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ferron v. METAREWARD, INC.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.