Legal Opinion
Broadnax v. City of New Haven
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 13, 2004No. SC 16786PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The defendants appeal and the plaintiffs cross appeal from the judgment of the trial court.1 The plaintiffs, Sheryl Broadnax, Ronald Benson, John R. Brantley, Danny Dolphin, Clifton Pettaway and Christopher Texeira brought this action against the defendants, the city of New Haven, (city), the city’s department of fire services (fire department), the city’s board of fire commissioners, and the city’s civil service commission, seeking various relief as a result of the defendants’ use of “underfilling”2 as a means of funding promotions *137within the fire department. The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- PSE Consulting, Inc. v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Lebron v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Nazami v. Patrons Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. IBAN C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Kelly v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.