City of Yakima v. Dahlin
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
This is a condemnation proceeding. The Supreme Court granted a joint petition for writ of certiorari. The matter was then assigned to this court. Two rulings of the trial court are questioned. Since oral argument, counsel for both parties have informed this court that one of the issues has been resolved.
The remaining issue is:
Can alleged excessive traffic noise resulting from the proposed construction of an overpass be considered as a factor affecting the highest and best use of abutting property and thus its market value?
The trial judge answered “Yes.” We affirm in the special circumstances…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Martin v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Smith v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GaleenerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Campbell v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Harding v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Volunteers of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006