Legal Opinion

Smith v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1905No. 4958PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Belt, J., entered June 29, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for damages to property by the construction and operation of a railroad.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

Respondents are the owners of lots J and 8, in block 6, of Ide & Kauffman’s Addition to Spokane, which lots face upon the north side of Bridge avenue, a public street *356sixty feet in width, having an east and west course. Said lots extend from said avenue northerly one hundred and seventeen feet along the line of Cannon street, which is sixty feet wide, running north and south. Prior to this action appellant had constructed and was operating a railway line, which, for a distance of about a quarter of a mile to the east, and for a half mile to the west, of respondent’s property, paralleled said…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jordan v. City of BenwoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. City of Denver v. BayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  4. Brown v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Hootch Ex Rel. Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated School SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Patrick v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Ponischil v. Hoquiam Sash & Door Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Farnandis v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API