Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Tomkins

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 2006No. Docket 256038PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this condemnation action, defendants Rodney Tomkins and Darcy Tomkins appeal by right the trial court’s order granting plaintiff Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10). We reverse and remand.

I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This case stems from a right-of-way that MDOT acquired for construction of the M-6 highway just outside of Grand Rapids. The 20-mile, $420 million M-6 project largely redefined most of the Grand Rapids metropolitan area by connecting 1-96 to M-37 and US 131, and by providing a limited access highway loop around the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. In Re Trejo MinorsMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ligon v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Ligon v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API