Department of Transportation v. Tomkins
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In this condemnation action, defendants Rodney Tomkins and Darcy Tomkins appeal by right the trial court’s order granting plaintiff Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10). We reverse and remand.
I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case stems from a right-of-way that MDOT acquired for construction of the M-6 highway just outside of Grand Rapids. The 20-mile, $420 million M-6 project largely redefined most of the Grand Rapids metropolitan area by connecting 1-96 to M-37 and US 131, and by providing a limited access highway loop around the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In Re Trejo MinorsMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Ligon v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ligon v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008