Legal Opinion
Glaxo Group Ltd. v. Apotex, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 26, 2003No. 00 C 5791PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
This court has conducted a bench trial on plaintiff GlaxoSmithKline Beecham Corp.’s claims against defendant Apotex, Inc. for a declaration of infringement of patent nos. 4562181 and 4,820,833, and on Apotex’s counterclaims of invalidity. In accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), the court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. 1
PARTIES’ STIPULATION OF UNCONTESTED FACTS 2
1. This is an action for patent infringement. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a), 2201…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Glaxo Group Limited and Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH v. Cobalt Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH v. Lupin Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Glaxo Group Ltd. v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2003
- Colucci v. Callaway Golf Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.