Legal Opinion

Glaxo Group Ltd. v. Apotex, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided July 22, 2003No. 00 C 5791PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETTLEMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Glaxo Group Limited and SmithKline Beecham Corp. (“plaintiff’) sued defendant Apotex, Inc. for a declaration of infringement of patent Nos. 4,562,-181 and 4,820,832, and defendant counterclaimed for invalidity. After a lengthy bench trial, the court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in plaintiffs favor, concluding that defendant’s proposed generic cefuroxime axetil product will infringe the two patents, and permanently enjoining defendant from manufacturing its product for the life of those patents. Glaxo Group…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In the Matter of Douglas R. Prince and Jane Prince, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Glaxo, Inc., and Glaxo Group Limited v. Novopharm, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Warner-Lambert Company v. Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hajro v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  2. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API