Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
DECISION
Harris Corporation (Harris) appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, holding Harris liable for willfully infringing claims 1 and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,198,904 (the ’904 patent) assigned to Comark Communications, Inc. (Comark). See Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris Corp., 47 USPQ2d 1469 (E.D.Pa.1998) (awarding costs and attorneys’ fees); Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris Corp., No. 95-CV-2123, 1997 WL 431000 (E.D.Pa. July 17, 1997) (denying Harris’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by596 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
591 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.