Legal Opinion
Colucci v. Callaway Golf Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided October 1, 2010No. Civil Action 6:08cv288-JDLPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN D. LOVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Callaway Golf Company’s (“Callaway”) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law that the '927 Patent is Obvious (Doc. No. 201) (“Renewed Motion”). Plaintiff Nicholas Colucci, d/b/a EZ Line Putters (“Colucci”) opposed the Renewed Motion with a Response (Doc. No. 202) (“Response”) and a Surreply (Doc. No. 208) (“Surreply”). Callaway additionally filed a Reply (Doc. No. 206) (“Reply”). For the reasons discussed herein, Callaway’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Col…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.