Legal Opinion
Dougery v. Bettencourt
California Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1931No. Docket No. Sac. 4411PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment quieting the title of defendant Bettencourt to certain real property in Glenn County. Plaintiff’s claim of title is based upon a tax deed of J. J. Ossenbriggen, county treasurer of Colusa County, as trustee of the bond fund of reclamation district 2047, within which district the lands involved herein are located. This deed is dated August 12, 1927, and was duly and properly recorded in Glenn County on August 13', 1927. Based upon this deed, _ plaintiff brought this action to quiet title, naming as party defendants Frank J. Bettencourt, the original…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wolpert v. GriptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Cady v. PurserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Hinds v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Numitor Gold Mining Co. v. KatzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Watkins v. WilhoitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. GustafsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Smith v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Gilbert v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- City of Compton v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.