Legal Opinion
D & J Quarry Products, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 12, 1991No. 14059PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The issue in these consolidated appeals is the extent of local authority to amend zoning regulations so as to prohibit the accessory processing of earth products excavated beyond town limits. Following the adoption of such amendments by the planning and zoning commission of the town of Beacon Falls (commission), the plaintiffs, D & J Quarry Products, *449Inc., O & G Industries, Inc., and Hamden Sand and Gravel Company, appealed to the Superior Court. Each plaintiff raised similar, albeit not identical, claims that adoption of the amendments illegally restricted their right to continue valid…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Lawrence v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- O & G Industries, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bombero v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Queach Corp. v. Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.