Legal Opinion

Fursdon v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1950PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

100 Cal.App.2d Supp. 845 (1950)

H. P. FURSDON et al., Respondents,

v.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Appellant.

California Court of Appeals.

Oct. 24, 1950.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, and Milnor E. Gleaves, Deputy County Counsel, for Appellant.

Francis C. Jones and Theodore R. Coomber for Respondents.

SHAW, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment for plaintiffs. [1] There are no express findings, and we have no record of the evidence, the appeal being presented on the judgment roll. We must, therefore, regard all allegations of plaintiffs' complaint as true. If there were allegations of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. CrespiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Irwin v. County of YubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Gibson v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. In Re SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Winton v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. County of San Diego v. MilotzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Sherwood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. HardinAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API