Legal Opinion

In Re Sing

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1910No. Civ. No. 860PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of prohibition to a judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, sitting as a committing magistrate of the juvenile court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The petitioner represents that heretofore an affidavit was signed by one McLaughlin before a deputy county clerk of Los Angeles county charging petitioner with a violation of section 26 of the act know’n as the juvenile court law (Laws 1909, p. 213); that thereafter the probation officer of the juvenile court arrested petitioner and he was taken before respondent, a judge of the superior court of said county; that said judge then and there set the cause for preliminary hearing and examination before himself sitting as a committing magistrate, said examination to be had at 9 o’clock…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Lee LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Ex parte DimmigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Andrews v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State v. PayUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Fursdon v. County of Los AngelesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API