Legal Opinion

People v. Peters

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1978No. Crim. 20257PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWMAN, J.

The People appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of an indictment dated May 5, 1976, charging that defendant committed a felony. Defendant argues that the dismissal was justified because, at a first preliminary examination on October 14 and a second on December 16, 1975, the magistrates had dismissed prosecutions of him for the same offense. Penal Code section 1387 states that “. . . dismissal of an action pursuant to this chapter is a bar to any other prosecution for the same *751offense if it is a felony and the action has been previously dismissed pursuant to this chapter. .…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. BriteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Fursdon v. County of Los AngelesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1950
  4. Horner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Fursdon v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Burris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Ramos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Holman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API