Irwin v. County of Yuba
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County. Edwin A. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
The complaint sets forth that certain counties of the state, to wit, Yuba, Sutter, Sacramento, Colusa, Glenn, Tehama, Yolo, and Solano, “banded together for self-protection against” certain alleged “danger and damage” arising from the deposit through hydraulic mining operations of “masses of debris, gravel, sand,'and other heavy material into the Feather, Yuba, and Bear rivers, filling up the channels of said rivers, thereby causing the same to overflow their hanks,” thus causing “many thousands of acres of valuable land therein to he entirely destroyed and rendered valueless”; and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Supervisors v. . EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Welsh v. BramletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Andrews v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Hartson v. DaleWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Moore v. Independent District of Toledo CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Anderson v. Board of Com'rs of Grant CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Board of Com'rs of Washita County v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Gibson v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Clayton v. BarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- County of Santa Cruz v. BarnesArizona Supreme Court · 1904
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.