Gibson v. County of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The complaint alleges: The plaintiffs are attorneys at law, engaged in practice at the city of Sacramento; that on the first day of June, 1917, an accusation in writing against Hugh B. Bradford, district attorney of the county of Sacramento, was presented by the grand jury of said county, pursuant to the provisions of section 758 of the Penal Code, which was filed with the county clerk and presented to Honorable Malcolm C. Glenn, judge of the superior court of said county, who, on the seventeenth day of June, 1917, appointed plaintiffs as prosecuting officers in the matter óf said accusation,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- County of Modoc v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In re CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Irwin v. County of YubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. McKamyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Lamont v. Solano Cty.California Supreme Court · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Zellerino v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Clayton v. BarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Washington Township Hospital District v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.