Legal Opinion

South River Power Partners, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

South River Power Partners (South River) petitions for review of an interlocutory order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which requires South River to send, at its own expense, due process notice of its proposed sale of electricity1 to the West Penn Power Company (West Penn) to all customers of West Penn. We are also presented with a motion by West Penn to quash portions of South River’s petition for review for having failed to initially raise certain issues before the PUC.

South River is the developer of a waste coal and coal-fired facility to be located in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Fairview Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stermel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Mark D. v. Municipal Boundary CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Cox v. MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY COM'NNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API