Legal Opinion
Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 17, 1990No. 2074 and 2092 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, Judge.
In several cases, including an earlier appeal involving this project, captioned Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 119 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 81, 546 A.2d 1296, reargument denied, 119 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 81, 550 A.2d 257 (1988) (Milesburg I), this court has considered various procedural questions concerning the implementation by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC or Commission) of the federal legislation and regulations designed to encourage the development of cogeneration and small power production from alternative energy sources.
In the present…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Snow Mountain Pine Co. v. MaudlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Smith Cogeneration Management, Inc. v. Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Arippa v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- GPU Industrial Intervenors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.