Legal Opinion
Mark D. v. Municipal Boundary Commission
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 13, 1998No. 17823PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Judge.
¶ 1. This is the latest in a long series of disputes between the City of Sunland Park, which wishes to annex certain land in the Santa Teresa area of southern Dona Ana County, and various residents of the area who object. See Cox v. Municipal Boundary Comm’n, 120 N.M. 703, 905 P.2d 741 (Ct. App.1995) (Cox I). Today we decide: (1) whether the Municipal Boundary Commission (the Commission) may appeal from the order of the district court remanding this action for a new hearing after new notice; (2) whether the Commission published sufficient notice of its hearing on January…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Stinbrink v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cordova v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AhasteenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Los Chavez Cmty. Assn. v. Valencia Cnty.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Los Chavez Community v. Valencia CountyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Gutierrez v. J & B MOBILE HOMESNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Cox v. MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY COM'NNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998