Legal Opinion
Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 28, 1985No. 83-2166PublishedCited by 783 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
Since the decision in Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U. S. 748 (1976), in which the Court held for the first time that the First Amendment precludes certain forms of regulation of purely commercial speech, we have on a number of occasions addressed the constitutionality of restraints on advertising and solicitation by attorneys. See In re R. M. J., 455 U. S. 191 (1982); In re Primus, 436 U. S. 412 (1978); Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn., 436 U. S. 447 (1978); Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U. S. 350 (1977). This case presents additional unresolved…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by783 opinions
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Riley v. National Federation of Blind of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Edenfield v. FaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Florida Bar v. Went for It, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
778 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.