Legal Opinion

Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 1988No. Appeals 2418 C.D. 1987, 2499 C.D. 1987 and 2522 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

■ These consolidated cases are appeals by industrial ratepayers and the Office of Consumer Advocáte (OCA) from an' order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC or commission) that (1) approved the terms of a proposed contract for the purchase • of electric power by West Penh Power Company (West Penn) from Milesburg Energy, Inc. (MEI) as being in the public interest, (2) authorized West Penn to recover payments made to MEI under the contract ■ from its ratepayers through the mechanism of the Energy Cost Rate (ECR), and (3) declared in effect that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Public Utility Commission v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. City of Pittsburgh v. West Penn Power Comp., D/B/A Allegheny Power Allegheny Power System, Incorporated Duquesne Light Company Dqe, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Arippa v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Armco Advanced Materials Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API