Legal Opinion

Cox v. MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY COM'N

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1998No. 17823PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

954 P.2d 1186 (1998)

124 N.M. 709

1998-NMCA-025

Mark D. and Catherine H. COX, et al., Petitioners-Appellees,

v.

MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION and The City of Sunland Park, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 17823.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

January 13, 1998.

Sarah M. Singleton, Grace Philips, Montgomery & Andrews, P.A., Santa Fe, for appellees.

Tom Udall, Attorney General, Monica M. Ontiveros, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, for appellant Municipal Boundary Commission.

Paul D. Mannick, Frank R. Coppler, Coppler & Mannick, P.C., Santa Fe, for appellant City of Sunland Park.

OPINION

BOSSON, Judge.

¶ 1.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Stinbrink v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Cordova v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AhasteenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Los Chavez Cmty. Assn. v. Valencia Cnty.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Los Chavez Community v. Valencia CountyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Gutierrez v. J & B MOBILE HOMESNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API