Legal Opinion

Kruis v. McKenna

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

¶ 1 In this appeal, we must determine whether the trial court had authority to enter a judgment of non pros, where Appellants failed to appear at a “Non-Jury Status/Trial Scheduling Conference” and a subsequent rule returnable hearing to explain their absence from the conference. We must also determine whether the trial court erroneously denied Appellants’ petition to vacate the judgment of non pros, where the petition was filed within ten-days from the date the non pros was entered, and Appellants presented a meritorious cause of action. We hold that the trial court had authority under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sahutsky v. H.H. Knoebel SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Stock v. ArnottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Lee v. Cel-Pek Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. MacKintosh-Hemphill International, Inc. v. Gulf & Western, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Simmons v. LuallenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Attix v. LehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Horwath, S. v. DiGrazio, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. O'Hara v. RandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Berger, D. v. Comcast Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. C.M. Bradley v. West Chester Univ.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API