Legal Opinion

Sahutsky v. H.H. Knoebel Sons

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 2001No. 208 MAP 1999PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE,

This Court granted allocatur to consider the effect of appellees’ failure to file a petition to open a judgment of non pros pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 3051 before filing a direct appeal from that judgment in the Superior Court. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the failure to initially file a petition to open resulted in a waiver of appellees’ claims. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the Superior Court and reinstate the judgment of non pros.

On June 24, 1994, appellees filed a complaint seeking to recover damages for personal injury sustained by Janice…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Benson v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Marino v. HackmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Womer v. HillikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Interest of K.L.SSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Madrid v. ALPINE MOUNTAIN CORP.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Gustine Uniontown Associates, Ltd. v. Anthony Crane Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API