Sahutsky v. H.H. Knoebel Sons
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice CASTILLE,
This Court granted allocatur to consider the effect of appellees’ failure to file a petition to open a judgment of non pros pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 3051 before filing a direct appeal from that judgment in the Superior Court. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the failure to initially file a petition to open resulted in a waiver of appellees’ claims. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the Superior Court and reinstate the judgment of non pros.
On June 24, 1994, appellees filed a complaint seeking to recover damages for personal injury sustained by Janice…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Benson v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Marino v. HackmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Womer v. HillikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Interest of K.L.SSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Madrid v. ALPINE MOUNTAIN CORP.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Gustine Uniontown Associates, Ltd. v. Anthony Crane Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.