Legal Opinion

Attix v. Lehman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 2007PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 Defendant Patricia Lehman appeals from the order denying her petition to open a default judgment in favor of plaintiffs Jeffrey Edward Attix and his parents, Gail Greenspon and Ross Attix. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. 1

¶ 2 This appeal stems from an accident in which a car operated by Lehman struck then-17-year-old Jeffrey Attix, who was riding his bicycle. Jeffrey suffered a broken ankle and other injuries. Plaintiffs initiated this action via writ of summons; the complaint was filed on October 27, 2005. On April 17, 2006, plaintiffs sent notice to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cintas Corp. v. Lee's Cleaning Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. McCoy v. Public Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Liquid Carbonic Corp. v. Cooper & Reese, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Alba v. Urology Associates of KingstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Penn-Delco School District v. Bell Atlantic-Pa, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Smith v. Morrell Beer Distributors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Boatin v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Americhoice Fed. Credit Union v. Ross, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Stabley v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Easton Condominium Association, Inc. v. K.A. NashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API