Legal Opinion
O'Hara v. Randall
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BOWES, J.:
¶ 1 Dr. Ronald Richterman, Dr. Edward Carey, Dr. Akram Zaiatimo, Dr. Minda Bermudez, Valley Open MRI & Diagnostic Center (“Valley MRI”), Burns, Rumbaugh, Carlisle & Rittenberg Urologic Associates (“Urologic Associates”), and Dr. Charles Burns, Jr. (collectively “Appellants”) challenge orders vacating judgments of non pros entered in this medical malpractice action for failure to file certificates of merit in accordance with Pa.R.C.P. 1042.3(a). Upon review, we vacate and remand with instructions.
¶ 2 The record establishes the following. On December 19, 2003, Beth O’Hara,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hoover v. DavilaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Kruis v. McKennaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- MacKintosh-Hemphill International, Inc. v. Gulf & Western, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3Cited by9 opinions
- Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Ditch v. Waynesboro HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Stroud v. Abington Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Woods v. Woods, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Armstrong County2005
- Almes v. BurketSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.