Snipes v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Since the trial court did not specify the grounds upon which defendants’ motions for summary judgment were granted, this Court must examine every basis for the rulings. The record on appeal indicates that summary judgment in defendants’ favor could have been entered because the trial court believed plaintiffs action was barred by the statute of limitations. In the alternative the court may have decided there was no issue of fact regarding the allegations of negligence. Summary judgment in defendant Veazey’s favor also could have been entered because the court found no issue of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Isaacson, Stolper & Co. v. Artisan's Savings BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Raftery v. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Moore v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- ESTATE OF SMITH, BY & THROUGH SMITH v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Sahadi v. ScheafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Bartlett v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.