Legal Opinion

Samuel Blanken & Co., Inc. v. Shannon & Luchs Company

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 1, 1966No. 20060PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves the same subject matter as Samuel Blanken & Co. v. Sigmund Goldblatt et al. (No. 20,014, Dec. 1, 1966), 371 F.2d 949, decided this day adversely to appellant. No attempt will be made here to discuss the facts delineated therein, except to state that appellee here is the agent of the lessor and that appellant, having failed to recover against appellee in a prior contract action, Blanken v. Goldblatt, et al., No. 19,536 (Nov. 23, 1965), is here seeking recovery of the reasonable value of his services by way of quantum meruit.

The District Court granted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Samuel Blanken & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Sigmund GoldblattCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Darrell R. Page v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. A. Ernest Fitzgerald v. Robert C. Seamans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Edouard Legille v. C. Marshall Dann, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API