Finnan v. Reclamation Dist. No. 273
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. J. A. Plummer, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. F. E. Boland, McCutcheon, Olney & Willard, and Clary & Louttit, for Appellants. A. H. Ashley, R. C. Minor, George F. McNoble, and F. O. Housken, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
On February 8, 1910, there was filed with the board of supervisors of San Joaquin County a petition for the levy of an assessment, No. 3, of $167,006.90, upon the 7047.80 acres of land in Reclamation District No. 773 (situated entirely in San Joaquin County) and, on the same day, respondents, as the owners of 317 acres of land in said district, filed with said board their protest against said levy and, on February 25, following, they filed an additional protest. The board of supervisors, however, appointed commissioners to levy the assessment prayed for.
On June 12, 1911, the assessment-list…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Mulligan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Wilcox v. EngebretsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- German Savings & Loan Society v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meyer v. Reclamation District No. 17California Supreme Court · 1916
- Spurrier v. Reclamation District No. 17California Supreme Court · 1916
- Richardson v. BrowningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Finnan v. Bd. of Supervisors of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915