Spurrier v. Reclamation District No. 17
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action brought under the provisions of section 3462 of the Political Code, as amended in 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 644), by the appellants herein, owners of certain tracts of land in the defendant reclamation district, for the purpose of annulling or canceling all assessments (aggregating the sum of $2,764) upon their lands, which consist of three contiguous tracts having a total area of three hundred and four acres. The assessment levied upon the lands of the appellants involved only levee and protective embankments. Upon the trial judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant. An…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reclamation Dist. No. 673 v. DiepenbrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Guy v. WashburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Justice v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Reclamation Dist. No. 17 v. BonbiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Reclamation District v. HersheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Spurrier v. NeumillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Silva v. Reclamation District No. 1001California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Whitley v. Islais Creek Reclamation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932