Legal Opinion

Finnan v. Bd. of Supervisors of San Joaquin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1915No. Civ. No. 1323Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. G. W. Nicol, Judge, presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. F. E. Boland, McCutcheon, Olney & Willard, and Clary & Louttit, for Appellant. A. H. Ashley, R. C. Minor, George F. McNoble, and F. O. Housken, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This is a companion case to No. 1330, ante, p. 714, [148 Pac. 227], the opinion in which is filed herewith. While this bears an earlier number on appeal than the other cause, it was brought later in the superior court, as we have already seen. For a statement of the facts it is sufficient to refer to said opinion in No. 1330. If we are right in the conclusions reached therein, this action was unnecessary and resulted in costs that might have been avoided. However, the fact that the other action was pending does not seem to have been called to the attention of the learned trial judge who…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Finnan v. Reclamation Dist. No. 273California Court of Appeal · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API