Legal Opinion

Finn v. McCuen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 26, 1990No. 90-232PublishedCited by 425 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The respondent, W.J. “Bill” McCuen, Secretary of State, certified a proposed constitutional amendment to be placed on the ballot in the coming general election. The petitioners, John Finn and Don Elliott, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, and an organization known as Citizens Against Legalized Lottery ask that we review Mr. McCuen’s action in accordance with Ark. Const, amend. 7. They contend that the ballot title is insufficient and misleading and that certain signatures which were counted among those needed to place the initiated amendment on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hoban v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Gaines v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Walton v. McDonald, SEC. of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Ferstl v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Dust v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by425 opinions

  1. Bailey v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Plugge Ex Rel. Arkansas for Representative Democracy v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Roberts v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Page v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Scott v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

420 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API