Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Priest

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 7, 2000No. 00-485PublishedCited by 155 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANNABELLE CLINTON Imber, Justice.

This is an original stice. petitioner seeks early review of a proposed constitutional amendment pursuant to Act 877 of 1999.1 Petitioner Bobby Roberts acts on behalf of himself and Arkansans to Protect Police, Libraries, Education & Services (APPLES), a ballot-question committee. The measure before us is a proposed amendment that would abolish all ad valorem taxes, increase the statewide sales tax, and alter the manner in which all taxes within the State are increased or decreased. Mr. Roberts charges that the popular name and ballot title are misleading, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pafford v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Arkansas Women's Political Caucus v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Becker v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Moore v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. Kurrus Ex Rel. Arkansans to Protect Police, Libraries, Education, & Services (APPLES) v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Ward v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. May v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Cox v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Lackey v. BramblettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API