Scott v. Priest
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
Petitioners Monty Scott and others bring this original action challenging the validity of the ballot title to proposed Amendment 8, which would allow the establishment of up to eleven gambling casinos in the state, and legalize lottery, charitable raffles, and bingo games in the state. Petitioners generally contend the ballot tide is too long, complex, and detailed to permit a voter to read and comprehend the proposed amendment and make an informed decision on the proposal. Petitioners recognize this court’s prior holdings that length, in itself, does not render a ballot…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Finn v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Bradley v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Page v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Parker v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
3Cited by29 opinions
- Roberts v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Ward v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Walker v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- May v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Stilley v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.