Legal Opinion
Bailey v. McCuen
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 14, 1994No. 94-951PublishedCited by 402 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
This is an original action by the petitioners, R. Robert Bailey and Ed H. Smith, individually, and on behalf of The Committee to Save Arkansas Jobs, to remove the proposed Workers’ Compensation Amendment from the ballot. The petitioners seek a declaration that the initiative petition filed under Amendment 7 to the Arkansas Constitution is insufficient. They further seek removal of the proposed amendment from the November 8, 1994 ballot and a direction that any votes cast on the issue not be counted. The petitioners have moved on two fronts. First, they have alleged…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hoban v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Gaines v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Finn v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Walton v. McDonald, SEC. of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by402 opinions
- Roberts v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Kurrus Ex Rel. Arkansans to Protect Police, Libraries, Education, & Services (APPLES) v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Priest v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Parker v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Walker v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
397 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.