Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dust v. Riviere

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 2, 1982No. 82-173 & 82-190PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This is an original action by the petitioners seeking an injunction to prohibit the Secretary of State from certifying a proposed constitutional amendment as valid. John F. Wells, individually, and Independent Voters of Arkansas, Inc., were allowed to intervene as petitioners and they raise issues other than the validity of the ballot title. Ratepayers Fight Back, representative of several Arkansas organizations, has been allowed to intervene as respondent. Another lawsuit on this matter, filed by Wells in the Pulaski Chancery Court, and before us on appeal, has been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoban v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Becker v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Walton v. McDonald, SEC. of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Westbrook v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Finn v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Bailey v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Donovan v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Kurrus Ex Rel. Arkansans to Protect Police, Libraries, Education, & Services (APPLES) v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API