Legal Opinion

Williams v. Bruce's Juices, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided December 9, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, District Judge.

The defendant’s motion to quash the return upon the summons raises two questions: (1) Whether or not the defendant corporation Bruce’s Juices was doing business in Kentucky, and (2) whether or not S. A. Hart, the employee upon whom service was made, was an agent of the defendant corporation for the service of process as provided by Rule 4(d) (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, or by Section 51, Subsection 3 of the Civil Code of Practice of Kentucky.

The defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of Florida with its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lee v. Memphis Pub. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Cohen v. American Window Glass Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  3. McGriff v. Charles Antell, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Williams v. Campbell Soup Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1948
  5. Mahan v. Kenneth B. S. Robertson, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API