Cohen v. American Window Glass Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Defendant moves to dismiss on three grounds:
1. the insufficiency of the complaint;
2. the insufficiency of the service of process;
3. lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter.
According to the complaint plaintiffs are Class A stockholders of the defendant. The defendant is a Pennsylvania corporation authorized to do business in New York. The relief requested in the complaint is that:
1. It be determined that a certain dividend heretofore paid to preferred stockholders is an asset of the defendant, recoverable against its directors.
2. A certain plan of merger approved by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vannoy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
- Cohen v. American Window Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Air-Way Branches, Inc. v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Zuckerman v. McCulleyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.