McGriff v. Charles Antell, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice.
Appeal from an order quashing service of process. Affirmed. Costs on appeal to defendant.
Plaintiff alleges injuries from use of defendant’s hair application. She served process on a local television station’s manager on the assumption that he or the station from which defendant, a foreign corporation, purchased advertising time, was either doing the business of or was in charge of defendant’s office or place of business in Utah, within the meaning of that portion of Rule 4 (e) (4), Rules *168of Civil Procedure, relating .to service of process on foreign corporations doing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Cannon v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Dahl v. ColletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- L. D. Reeder Contractors of Arizona, an Arizona Corporation v. Higgins Industries, Inc., a Louisiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Babineaux v. Southeastern Drilling CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Conn v. WhitmoreUtah Supreme Court · 1959
- Hill v. Zale CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Buddensick v. Stateline Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.