Legal Opinion

Williams v. Campbell Soup Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided December 1, 1948No. 5350PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, Chief Judge.

A proper consideration of this case requires a statement of the averments contained in the first amended petition. It is alleged that both the corporate defendants are nonresidents of Missouri and,

“That defendants and each of them maintain a joint business office in the Business Men's Assurance Bldg, in Kansas City, Missouri; that C. Frank Coen of Kansas City, Missouri, is a managing or general agent of defendant Campbell Soup Company and of defendant Campbell Sales Com pany and is the person in charge of the joint business office of defendants aforesaid.”

It is then…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Commerce Trust Co. v. WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. Vilter Mfg. Co. v. RolaffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Superior Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1978
  2. Wooldridge v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
  3. Pergament v. FrazerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1949
  4. McIntyre v. Kansas City Coca Cola Bottling Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
  5. In Re Estate of BrockIdaho Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API