State v. Rhoades
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment declaring him to be a habitual traffic offender. ORS 484.705. 1 His ground for appeal is the court’s refusal to appoint an attorney to represent him in that proceeding.
Defendant appeared in response to an Order to Show Cause why he should not be declared a habitual traffic offender. He was accompanied by an attorney. The attorney, having been informed by defendant of his indigent status, moved the court to appoint an attorney for defendant. After the court denied this motion, the attorney removed himself from the counsel table and defendant represented himself.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. McKnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. McCartneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. ColeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
- State v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.