Legal Opinion

State v. McCartney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 30, 1983No. 82 1175; CA A26760PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for felony driving while suspended (DWS). ORS 487.560(6). He makes four assignments of error: denial of two motions for mistrial; denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal; and the imposition of a felony rather than a misdemeanor conviction. We affirm.

The arresting officer testified that he stopped defendant’s car and ran a “records check.” The prosecutor asked, “And * * * what information did you gain from the records check?” The officer answered, “Our dispatcher came back on the radio and explained that [defendant] was suspended as an habitual offender.”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. SmallwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. NulphCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. VelykoretskykhCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. GuritzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. MeiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API