Legal Opinion
State v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 30, 1978No. A7703-03690, CA 9061PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
Defendant appeals a determination that he is a Habitual Traffic Offender as defined in ORS 484.700 et seq. The determination was based on a finding by the court that defendant had been convicted of 20 or more traffic offenses within a five-year period. He contends the court should have excluded those traffic offense convictions obtained when he was neither represented by counsel nor shown to have effectively waived his right to counsel.
Defendant relies on Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 US 25, 92 S Ct 2006, 32 L Ed 2d 530 (1972); Loper v. Beto, 405 US 473, 92 S Ct 1014, 31 L Ed 2d 374 (1972);…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Loper v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Holen v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. RhoadesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Moore v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Moore v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.