Legal Opinion

People v. McKnight

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 2, 1980No. 79SA371PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

The appellant, Dewey Kenneth McKnight, was convicted in district court of Driving After Judgment Prohibited, section 42-2-206, C.R.S. 1973. McKnight has appealed, challenging the constitutionality of the statutes upon which his conviction is based. We affirm the conviction but vacate the sentence and remand the case to the trial court for resentenc-ing.

A brief outline of the relevant statutes will be of assistance in understanding the events in this case. The habitual traffic offender statute, sections 42-2-201 to 208, C.R.S. 1973, defines an habitual traffic offender 1 as one having a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Fogg v. MacAlusoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. People v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. People v. LeshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API