Legal Opinion
State v. Norton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 9, 1982No. 16-80-06153, CA 19992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
In this proceeding under the Habitual Traffic Offenders Act, ORS 484.700 to 484.750, defendant appeals from the trial court’s ruling that he is a habitual offender.
Under ORS 484.705, a habitual offender is a person who, within a five-year period, accumulates three convictions for any of certain listed traffic offenses, including driving while suspended.
ORS 484.720 provides:
“(1) The administrator of the division shall certify in triplicate an abstract of the operating record as maintained by the division, of a habitual offender to the district attorney of the county in which the person…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. Eight (8) Rhodesian Stone StatuesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RenteriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. RenteriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982