Legal Opinion
State v. Underwood
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided January 17, 1985No. 56,581PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Woleslagel, J.:
The question presented in this case is whether
multiple convictions for traffic offenses arising out of one incident are to be considered as separate convictions or only one conviction for purposes of the Kansas Habitual Traffic Violators Act, K.S.A. 8-284 et seq.
The critical portion of the act is K.S.A. 8-285, which provides in part:
“The term ‘habitual violator’ means any resident or nonresident person who, within the immediately preceding five years, has been convicted in this or any other state:
“(a) Three or more times of:
“(2) Driving while under the influence of alcohol or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. LuginbillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- State v. LohrbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Estes v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- State v. KnoffCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1994
- State v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985