Legal Opinion
City of Drumright v. Moore
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1946No. 32289PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
Plaintiff, Moore, sued the defendant city for damages for personal injuries. The trial court overruled defendant’s demurrer to the evidence and motion for directed verdict and submitted the case to a jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
The sole contention made by the defendant in this court is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict for plaintiff.
The evidence is undisputed. Plaintiff was employed by the city as a street sweeper and was required to report for work at the city fire station, in which were also housed some of the city offices.
There…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- City of Bristow v. PinkleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Long Construction Co. v. FournierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Smith v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Lowden v. Van MeterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Henryetta Construction Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Jackson v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Rogers v. Cato Oil & Grease Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Carter Oil Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.